Performance Dashboard

Environmental Data

ENERGY

GRI 302-1 | 302-4
302-1
Energy consumption within the organization

302-4
Reduction of energy consumption

 

FY 2017

FY 2018

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

Total Energy Consumption (MWh)1

3,058,000

3,103,200
5,398,000 5,423,000 5,832,000 6,145,000

Energy Reduction per Unit of Production2

-

-

Baseline
-
-0.3%
-2.3%

Electricity Used (MWh)

859,000

861,000
1,398,000
1,374,000
1,492,000
1,410,000

Renewable Electricity Used (Thousands of MWh)3

3
 4
15
15
32
5

Renewable Energy Consumption (Thousands of MWh)4

-

-
-
635
650
880

Renewable Electricity Sourced (%)5

-

-
-
81%
86%
69.1%

Renewable Energy Sourced (%)6

-

-
-
99.6%
99.3%
99.3%

Energy Reductions Due to Reduction Initiatives (Scope 1, 2, and 3; gigajoules)

27,000

 32,000
243,800
52,000
96,000
46,537

Notes:

  1. Total Energy and GHG Emissions experienced significant increases in 2019 due to Greif’s acquisition of Caraustar. Our FY2022 inventory provides more complete coverage of their operations and, for the first time, includes the following: diesel & LPG consumption for global facilities, global propane usage, co-generation at the Los Angeles facility, global rental car usage, electricity consumption at warehouse and office facilities. This has led to a large increase in total energy consumption and associated emissions.
  2. Energy use per unit of production only includes energy use at PPS Mills, PPS CorrChoice, PPS IPG, PPS RFG, GIP EMEA, GIP APAC, GIP North America, GIP Latin America, and LCS NA. This provides a more accurate year-over-year comparison in line with previous years' calculations.
  3. The FY2022 decrease in renewable electricity used is attributable to discontinued renewable electricity consumption at Brazilian sites.
  4. This figure includes self-generated solar, purchased renewable electricity, as well as energy consumed from biomass and OCC waste.
  5. This figure represents the percentage of consumed renewable electricity that is generated on-site and is not purchased from a supplier.
  6. This figure represents the percentage of consumed renewable energy that is generated on-site and is not purchased from a supplier.

FUEL

GRI 302-1
302-1
Energy consumption within the organization
 

FY 2017

FY 2018

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

Total Non-Renewable (gigajoules)1

5,470,000

5,626,000
12,083,000
11,977,000
12,245,000
13,788,000

Coal/Lignite Used (Thousands of MT)2

0
 0
 0.31
0.11
0.32
0.81

Natural Gas Used (Thousands of m3)3

135,100
 139,400
 303,900
303,300
310,500
345,300

Crude Oil/Distillate Fuels (Including Diesel, #2 Fuel) Used (Thousands of m3)4

11,660
 10,700
22,000
22,000
21,100
16,600

Renewables (gigajoules)5

2,446,000

 2,446,000
 2,316,000
2,232,000
2,222,000
3,242,000

Total Fuel (gigajoules)

7,916,000

 8,072,000
 14,399,000
14,209,000
14,467,000
17,030,000

Notes

  1. Sum of Scope 1 energy sources excluding biomass and OCC waste. Calculation includes propane, fuel oil, natural gas, natural gas used in cogeneration, coal/lignite, LPG, jet fuel, diesel, and motor gasoline.
  2. Converted from units of energy to mass using the coal HHV from the United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Emission Factors for Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 2022.
  3. Converted from units of energy to mass using the natural gas HHV from the United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Emission Factors for Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 2022.
  4. Converted from units of energy to mass using the distillate fuel oil number 1, distillate fuel oil number 2, LPG, kerosene-type jet fuel, motor gasoline, and propane HHVs from the United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Emission Factors for Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 2022.
  5. Includes biomass and OCC waste. Renewable electricity excluded from fuels section.
EMISSIONS (THOUSANDS OF METRIC TONS)1
GRI 305-1 | 305-2 | 305-3 | 305-4 | 305-5
305-1
Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions

305-2
Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions

305-3
Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions

305-4
GHG emissions intensity

305-5
Reduction of GHG emissions

 

FY 2017

FY 2018

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

GHG Scope 1

368

 377
686
693
697
756

GHG Scope 2 (Location-based) 2

416

416
622
590
557
565

GHG Scope 3

3,089

 2,867
 4,407
4,148
4,357
5,019

GHG Total

3,873

 3,660
5,715
5,430
5,611
6,340

Emissions Reduction per Unit of Production3

-

-
Baseline
-
4.1%
0.41%

GHG Intensity (Scope 1 and 2, total per $ revenue)

0.00022

0.00021
0.00028
0.00028
0.00023
0.00021

Emission Reductions Due to Reduction Initiatives (Scope 1, 2, and 3)4

25.0

 25.0
 3.0
3.7
4.5
3.9

Percentage of the Company’s Operations That Are Covered in Its Disclosures on Emissions5

100%

 100%
 100%
100%
100%
100%

Notes:

  1. Our FY2022 inventory provides more complete coverage of our operations and, for the first time, includes the following: diesel & LPG consumption for global facilities, global propane usage, co-generation at the Los Angeles facility, global rental car usage, electricity consumption at warehouse and office facilities. This has led to a large increase in total energy consumption and associated emissions.
  2. FY2019 Scope 2 emissions have been restated since 2021 because of Greif’s revised energy use data.
  3. Emissions per unit of production only includes emissions associated with energy use at PPS Mills, PPS CorrChoice, PPS IPG, PPS RFG, GIP EMEA, GIP APAC, GIP North America, GIP Latin America, and LCS NA. This provides a more accurate year-over-year comparison in line with previous years' calculations.
  4. Emissions Reductions are expressed in thousands of metric tonnes CO2e.
  5. Company's operations are defined as production facilities, warehouses, offices, and mobile fleet. Please note that Greif's emission reduction goal only includes emissions associated with production facilities (except the headquarters office in Delaware, Ohio).
  6. 2022 GHG Verification Statement

SCOPE 3 EMISSIONS (METRIC TONS)

 

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

Explanation

Purchased goods and services

2,323,000
2,492,000
3,330,000 -

Capital goods

83,000
105,000
145,000 -

Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2)

291,000
286,000
313,000
-

Upstream transportation and distribution

253,000
278,000
425,000
-

Waste generated in operations

153,000
131,000
158,000
-

Business travel

3,000
1,000
2,000
-

Employee commuting

26,000
27,000
15,000
-

Upstream leased assets

-
Greif does not lease any upstream assets that are not included in Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions calculations.

Downstream transportation and distribution

-
-
-
It is Greif's practice to deliver finished products to customers using transportation paid for by Greif.

Processing of sold products

-
-
-
Greif's products are typically finished packaging products and no further processing by the customer is required.

Use of sold products

-
-
-
Greif's products do not directly consume any energy during use nor do they release any direct GHG emissions.

End of life treatment of sold products

1,016,000
1,124,000
632,000
-

Downstream leased assets

-
-
-
Greif does not lease any assets to third parties that are not already included in Scope 1 and 2 emissions calculations.

Franchises

-
-
-
Greif does not have franchise operations.

Investments

-
-
-
As a manufacturing company, Greif does not make investments with the objective of making a profit.

Notes:

  1. Our FY2022 inventory provides more complete coverage of our operations and, for the first time, includes the following: diesel & LPG consumption for global facilities, global propane usage, co-generation at the Los Angeles facility, global rental car usage, electricity consumption at warehouse and office facilities. This has led to a large increase in total energy consumption and associated emissions.
  2. 2022 GHG Verification Statement

Water

GRI 303-3 | 303-4
303-3
Water withdrawal

303-4
Water discharge

 

FY 2017

FY 2018

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

Water Withdrawal
(Thousands of cubic meters)1

9,666.3

9,360.8 

13,864.4

12,936.6

13,164.7

13,364.7

Surface Water

9,242.7

8,630.0 

10,266.8

10,132.0

10,274.8

10,634.9 

Ground Water

423.6

730.7 

3,597.6

2,804.6

2,889.9

2,729.8

Rainwater

 -  -  - - -

-

Wastewater

-  -  - - -

-

Municipal Water2

 -  -  - - -

-

Wastewater Discharge
(Thousands of cubic meters)3

8,983.2

9,316.2 

12,066.6

12,393.3

12,013.53

12,415.6 

James River

8,788.8

8,907.1 

7,949.5

8,375.0

8,324.8

8,473.9

City of Massillon

191.6

407.1 

424.0

355.8

400.9

380.7

Tuscarawas River

2.8

2.0 

2.5

8.8

69.0

11.5

Sweetwater Creek4

 -

 -

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Cobb County WWTP4

 -

 -

844.9

855.0

854.9

903.3

Enoree River (Carotell)

 -

 -

 -

 -

 -

7.48

Cincinnati Metropolitan Sewerage District5

 -

 -

37.6

40.6

49.8

83.7

Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District5

 -

 -

349.0

335.9

328.4

381.2

Los Angeles County Sanitation District WWTF5

 -

 -

196.8

189.1

214.9

257.2

Three Mile Creek4

 -

 -

0.0

-

-

-

Village of Baltimore WWTF3

 -

 -

0.0

6.1

129.93

109.9

West Branch Paw Paw Creek3

 -

 -

697.1

581.4

0.0

0.0

San Jose-Santa Clara Regional WWTP5

 -

 -

288.1

334.2

383.2

326.4

Tacoma Central WWTP5

 -

 -

6.9

8.5

10.9

16.2

City of Fitchburg WWTP4

 -

 -

322.6

309.0

298.7

337.3

Iowa River3

 -

 -

291.8

364.9

341.3

357.7

Cherry Lake3

 -

 -

597.8

550.4

479.7

485.3

Iowa Tributary3

 -

 -

58.0

78.6

127.08

283.9

Wastewater Discharge, Fresh (<1000mg/L dissolved solids) or Other (>1000mg/L)

James River

-

-

-

-

-

Fresh

City of Massillon

-

-

-

-

-

Other

Tuscarawas River

-

-

-

-

-

Fresh

Sweetwater Creek4

-

-

-

-

-

Fresh

Cobb County WWTP4

-

-

-

-

-

Other

Enoree River (Carotell)

-

-

-

-

-

Fresh

Cincinnati Metropolitan Sewerage District5

-

-

-

-

-

Other

Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District5

-

-

-

-

-

Other

Los Angeles County Sanitation District WWTF5

-

-

-

-

-

Other

Three Mile Creek4

-

-

-

-

-

-

Village of Baltimore WWTF3

-

-

-

-

-

Other

West Branch Paw Paw Creek3

-

-

-

-

-

Fresh

San Jose-Santa Clara Regional WWTP5

-

-

-

-

-

Other

Tacoma Central WWTP5

-

-

-

-

-

Other

City of Fitchburg WWTP4

-

-

-

-

-

Other

Iowa River3

-

-

-

-

-

Fresh

Cherry Lake3

-

-

-

-

-

Fresh

Iowa Tributary3

-

-

-

-

-

Fresh

Wastewater Discharge (Destination Type)

James River

-

-

-

-

-

Surface water

City of Massillon

-

-

-

-

-

Third-party

Tuscarawas River

-

-

-

-

-

Surface water

Sweetwater Creek4

-

-

-

-

-

Surface water

Cobb County WWTP4

-

-

-

-

-

Third-party

Enoree River (Carotell)

-

-

-

-

-

Surface water

Cincinnati Metropolitan Sewerage District5

-

-

-

-

-

Third-party

Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District5

-

-

-

-

-

Third-party

Los Angeles County Sanitation District WWTF5

-

-

-

-

-

Third-party

Three Mile Creek4

 -

 -

-

-

-

-

Village of Baltimore WWTF3

-

-

-

-

-

Third-party

West Branch Paw Paw Creek3

-

-

-

-

-

Surface water

San Jose-Santa Clara Regional WWTP5

-

-

-

-

-

Third-party

Tacoma Central WWTP5

-

-

-

-

-

Third-party

City of Fitchburg WWTP4

-

-

-

-

-

Third-party

Iowa River3

-

-

-

-

-

Surface water

Cherry Lake3

-

-

-

-

-

Surface water

Iowa Tributary3

-

-

-

-

-

Surface water

Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(Thousands of kg)

890.4

204.2

3,508.3

3,457.1

3,823.8

3,250.5

Total Suspended Solids (kg)

465,098

349,003

1,224,442

1,045,928

1,031,666

1,231,570

Phosphorus (kg)

4,991

6,617  4,708 4,445 8,817

8,064

Production (MT)

690,000

713,336 

1,729,062

1,661,228

1,721,897

1,660,388

Consumption Rate (m3/MT)

14.0

13.1 

8.02

7.79

7.65

8.05

  1. Evaporative losses estimated.
  2. Greif does not currently track withdrawal of municipal water.
  3. Treated with primary clarification, secondary clarification and aeration before direct discharge.
  4. Treated with wastewater pre-treatment including soluble BOD removal.
  5. Treated with wastewater pre-treatment with solids only.

 
Notes:

  • WWTP = Wastewater Treatment Plant.
  • FY 2017 and 2018 data is from Greif’s two paper mills, one of which is located in Riverville, Virginia, and the other in Massillon, Ohio. Historically, these two paper mills accounted for more than 90 percent of Greif’s global water footprint. They draw from the James River and onsite water wells, respectively.
  • FY 2019 data includes 12 former Caraustar mills that were acquired and integrated in 2019. All 2019 data is full year data. Quality of wastewater discharged from our mills meets permit requirements. No discharged water was used by another organization.
  • FY 2019 data includes the Mobile Wright Smith WWTP, which was shut down in 2020, and been restated to properly account for FY 2019 West Branch Paw Paw Creek discharge.

Water Use in Regions With High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

Water Withdrawal (Thousands of cubic meters)

170.4

109.93

99.49

Percentage of Total Water Withdrawal

1%

1%

0.74%

Water Consumed (Thousands of cubic meters)

162.7

77.45

99.49

Percentage of Total Water Consumed

16.2%1

6.7%

9.5

Water Discharged (Thousands of cubic meters)

 -

 -

0

Percentage of Total Water Discharged

 -

 -

0%

  1. Figure amended due to previous error in calculation.

 
Notes:

  • Data collected from 24 Greif facilities operating in regions with high or extremely high baseline water stress, as defined by WRI's Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas tool. Annual withdrawal data from Greif's Algeria facility estimated based on total withdrawal since installing a well in approximately 2003. Percentages reported as a percentage of water used in Greif’s mill operations in our Paper Packaging & Services business only, which is estimated to represent 95% of Greif’s total water withdrawal and consumption. Greif does not currently report global water data for all facilities.

WASTE

GRI 306-3 | 306-4 | 306-5
306-3
Waste generated

306-4
Waste diverted from disposal

306-5
Waste directed to disposal

 

FY 2018

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022
Hazardous Waste (Metric Tons)

Total Waste to Landfill

1,639

2,428

3,608

1,026 1,451

Waste to Landfill

1,292

1,161

2,989

577 882

Incinerated (no energy recovery)1

347

1,267

619

449 569

Total Non-Landfill2

14,105

20,725

19,199

12,006 12,926

Incinerated (with energy recovery)3

3,372

4,073

3,275

4,480 4,359

Composted4

0

0

1

0 0

Recycled5

7,604

14,084

14,160

6,304 7,326

Reused6

1,513

651

706

482 178

Reclaimed7

217

366

376

172 264

Miscellaneous (Non-Landfill)8

1,399

1,551

681

568 799

Total Hazardous Waste

15,744

23,153

22,807

13,032 14,378

Non-Hazardous Waste (Metric Tons)

Total Waste to Landfill

54,594

33,837

137,211

147,710 143,796

Waste to Landfill

54,110

33,380

137,060

147,492 143,573

Incinerated (no energy recovery)1

485

457

151

218 223

Total Non-Landfill2

257,219

184,357

326,546

817,004 823,971

Incinerated (with energy recovery)3

2,054

2,950

17,006

13,330 15,277

Composted4

35

15,784

49,734

53,855 43,852

Recycled5

231,997

141,217

212,075

702,832 727,815

Reused6

11,641

12,321

19,441

18,442 16,041

Reclaimed7

9,439

9,847

11,701

12,191 14,375

Miscellaneous (Non-Landfill)8

2,052

2,239

16,589

16,353 6,611

Total Non-Hazardous Waste

311,813

218,194

463,757

964,714 967,767

Total Waste (Hazardous & Non-Hazardous)

327,557

241,347

486,564

977,746 982,145
  1. Incinerated (no energy recovery): Treatment method involving the combustion of solid waste that does not result in energy capture.
  2. Non-Landfill: Includes chemical-physical, incineration with energy recovery, recycled, reused, reclaimed, composted and fuels blending treatment methods.
  3. Incinerated (with energy recovery): Treatment method involving the combustion of solid waste that results in energy capture.
  4. Composted: Treatment method involving the biological decomposition of solid or liquid operational waste.
  5. Recycled: Treatment method involving the separation, preparation and sale of recyclable materials to end-user manufacturers.
  6. Reused: Treatment method involving the use of a material for its original purpose multiple times.
  7. Reclaimed: Treatment method involving the process of extracting and converting materials from recycled materials to be used again.
  8. Miscellaneous (Non-Landfill): All other treatment methods not mentioned previously, including Deep Well Injection and On-Site Storage.

 
Notes:

  • Legacy Caraustar facilities were incorporated into waste reporting in FY 2020.
  • Total waste and Non-Hazardous recycling doubled from 2020 to 2021 due to inclusion of additional data from RFG facilities; in 2020 RFG and IPG only included data from their own operational waste streams. However, RFG also collects wastepaper from the market and recycles them.
  • FPS facilities were divested in FY 2022.
  • Minor revisions have been made to the FY 2021 waste data according to recommendations from ERM CVS.
  • 2022 Waste data assurance statement

PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT (SASB RT-CP-410A.1, RT-CP-410A.2)

Raw Materials from Recycled and Renewable Sources (FY 2022, % of Metric Tons)

Percent of Substrate

Percent of Total Materials Sourced

Total

-

84.6%

Recycled Content

-

71.1%

Fiber

83.4%

67.8%

Plastic

4.6%

0.2%

Steel

20.4%

3.1%

Renewable Sources

-

81.3%

Fiber

100%

81.3%

Plastic

0%

0%

Steel

0%

0%

Notes:

  • All figures are estimated based on our current product classifications and reporting practices. Data is estimated based on average procurement and manufacturing data across our product lines. Post Industrial Recycled (PIR) plastic data is not available for our Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services (RIPS) business segment. 90 percent of the fiber used in our Paper Packaging Services business segment is sourced from 100 percent recycled content. 100 percent of the fiber used in our Paper Packaging Services business segment is sourced from renewable sources. For reporting purposes, 100 percent of that volume is reported as renewable and recycled content.

Revenue From Products that are Reusable, Recyclable and/or Compostable ($)

FY 2021

FY 2022

Total

$4,719,069,067

$5,992,468,885

Recyclable

$4,712,465,950

$5,594,774,432

Reusable

-

-

Compostable

$6,603,117

$10,598,756

Notes:

  • All figures are estimated based on our current product classifications and financial reporting practices. Data has been aggregated to eliminate double counting. In our Global Industrial Packaging business, the majority of our products that are recyclable are also reusable. To avoid double counting and reporting our sales from both reusable and recyclable products, we only categorize those products as recyclable and report our revenue from recyclable products. Our Paper Packaging products are 99 percent recyclable based on volume. Our coated containerboards, which is part of our Paper Packaging Business are compostable.
LIFE CYCLE SERVICES – ESTIMATED DRUMS AND IBCS RECONDITIONED1

 

FY 2017

FY 2018
FY 2019
FY 2020
FY 2021
FY 2022

Recycled

904,883

849,498

831,576

968,296  1,153,345 517,369

Steel Drums

534,369

571,355

509,884

562,980  987,427 265,236

Poly Drums

212,272

161,447

243,186

358,280  95,176 184,618

IBCs

158,242

116,696

78,506

47,036  70,742 67,515

Reconditioned

3,218,885

3,258,848

3,533,358

3,276,259  3,164,809 2,220,026

Steel Drums

2,565,052

2,713,025

2,699,393

2,483,485  2,185,329 1,408,876

Poly Drums

321,188

244,497

194,011

178,627  141,782 152,385

IBCs

332,645

301,326

639,954

614,147  837,698 658,765

Total Collected

4,136,828

4,105,936

4,348,706

4,164,585  4,345,284 2,737,395

Steel Drums

3,099,633

3,284,380

3,193,049

2,971,549  3,192,196 1,674,112

Poly Drums

535,460

405,944

437,197

536,281  236,958 337,003

IBCs

501,735

415,612

718,460

656,755  916,130 726,280

Virgin Materials Saved by Reconditioning and Reuse (Metric Tons)2

63,111

63,587

76,415

71,149  74,713 54,031

Steel

56,200

57,664

66,860

62,016  63,143 44,592

High-Density Polyethylene

5,150

4,243

5,897

5,553  6,610 5,561

Wood

1,761

1,680

3,659

3,580  4,960 3,879

Virgin Materials Saved by Recycling (Metric Tons)3

18,755

16,644

14,117

14,358  19,772 9,330

Steel

13,463

12,697

10,273

10,215  17,394 6,239

High-Density Polyethylene

4,580

3,385

3,402

3,871  1,960 2,691

Wood

712

562

442

272 418 400
  1. Estimated Drums and Intermediate Bulk Containers (IBCs) Recycled and Reconditioned (North America and Europe, Middle East and Africa).
  2. Estimates based on the quantity of reconditioned packaging and average packaging specifications (North America and Europe).
  3. Estimates based on the quantity of recycled packaging and average packaging specifications (North America and Europe).

 
Notes:

  • Virgin Materials Saved by Reconditioning and Reuse data has been restated to standardize units across regions.

ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATIONAL POLICIES

Climate Change Policy

Climate Strategy

Climate Change Risks Discussed

2022 Annual Report, page 15–16; CDP C2.3a 

Energy Efficiency Policy

Climate Strategy

Emissions Reduction Initiatives

Climate Strategy

Waste Reduction Policy

Waste

Water Policy

Water

Sustainable Packaging

Innovation, Supply Chain Management

Environmental Quality Management Policy

Environmental Management Systems

Environmental Supply Chain Management

Environmental Management Systems, Supply Chain Management

GRI Criteria Compliance

About Our Report

Biodiversity Policy

Prioritizing Nature

Social Data

EMPLOYMENT

GRI 2-7 | 2-8 | 405-1
2-7
Employees

2-8
Workers who are not employees

405-1
Diversity of governance bodies and employees

 

FY 2017

FY 2018

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

Total Employees

13,171

13,066

17,042

15,720

15,828

12,280

Full Time

11,799

12,473

16,668

15,370

15,618

12,058

Part Time

175

151

169

162

210

190

Temporary

1,197

442

205

188

151

32

% Women in Management

17%

16%

16%

16%

16%

18%

% Women in Workforce

25%

24%

23%

23%

23%

15%

% Employees Covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements

50%

52%

45%

42%

46%

38%

FY 2022 EMPLOYMENT TYPE BY GENDER AND REGION

GRI 2-7 | 2-8
2-7
Employees

2-8
Workers who are not employees

Not Answered

Female

Male

Not Declared

Total

Total Full-time Employees

15

1,774

10,268

1

12,058

Asia Pacific

3

148

619

-

770

Europe, Middle East and Africa

5

444

2,745

-

3,194

Latin America

-

138

906

-

1,044

North America

7

1,044

5998

1

7,050

Total Part-time Employees

3

78

109

-

190

Asia Pacific

-

-

-

-

-

Europe, Middle East and Africa

1

62

61

-

124

Latin America

1

5

12

-

18

North America

1

11

36

-

48

Total Temporary Employees

-

2

30

-

32

Asia Pacific

-

-

-

-

-

Europe, Middle East and Africa

-

1

8

-

9

Latin America

-

0

19

-

19

North America

-

1

3

-

4

RACE AND ETHNICITY, U.S. ONLY

 

FY 2022

FY 2022, %

American Indian or Alaska Native (Not Hispanic or Latino) (United States of America)

40

0.6%

Asian (Not Hispanic or Latino) (United States of America)

144

2.3%

Black or African American (Not Hispanic or Latino) (United States of America)

1077

17.2%

Hispanic or Latino (United States of America)

1033

16.5%

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (Not Hispanic or Latino) (United States of America)

48

0.8%

Not Specified (United States of America)

266

4.2%

Two or More Races (Not Hispanic or Latino) (United States of America)

76

1.2%

White (Not Hispanic or Latino) (United States of America)

3576

57.1%

Total

6260

100.0%

New Colleague Hires

GRI 401-1
401-1
New employee hires and employee turnover

 

FY 2017

FY 2018

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

New Colleague Hires (Total)

2,925

2,941

3,626

2,910

3,330

4,150

Region

Asia Pacific

647

560

456

389

300

97

Europe, Middle East and Africa

991

1,279

1,074

805

854

651

Latin America

240

170

410

137

182

247

North America

1,047

932

1,686

1,579

1,994

3,155

Gender

Female

782

754

841

669

647

728

Male

2,143

2,187

2,785

2,209

2,683

3,422

Age

16–20

202

163

247

209

244

397

21–30

1,198

1,102

1,372

1,012

1,243

1,422

31–40

798

865

1,023

815

946

1,178

41–50

507

568

620

541

514

691

51–60

208

202

315

285

335

402

60+

12

31

49

46

48

60

Employee Attrition

GRI 401-1
401-1
New employee hires and employee turnover

 

FY 2017

FY 2018

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

Employee Attrition1

21.3%

24.3%

24.0%

20.5%

23.2%

29.5%

Region

Asia Pacific

20.2%

19.7%

14.8%

25.1%

25.8%

13.2%

Europe, Middle East and Africa

39.6%

40.0%

31.0%

14.9%

16.0%

18.0%

Latin America

8.0%

10.5%

9.1%

20.5%

18.3%

15.6%

North America

32.3%

29.8%

45.1%

24.3%

29.9%

38.9%

Length of Service

Less than 12 Months

50.2%

48.0%

49.0%

40.4%

47.5%

61.8%

More than 12 Months

49.8%

52.0%

51.0%

59.6%

52.2%

38.2%
  1. Attrition by region and length of service given as percent of attrition for fiscal year.

COLLEAGUES COVERED BY PARENTAL LEAVE POLICIES

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

Total

56%

62%

68%

99%

Asia Pacific

28%

29%

100%

100%

Europe, Middle East and Africa

99%

96%

96%

96%

Latin America

100%

100%

100%

100%

North America

18%

33%

32%

100%

COLLEAGUES COVERED BY PARENTAL LEAVE POLICIES BY REGION AND GENDER

GRI 401-3
401-3
Parental leave

Female Eligibility

Female Eligibility (%)

Male Eligibility

Male Eligibility (%)

Total

1,854

99%

10,407

99%

Asia Pacific

148

100%

619

100%

Europe, Middle East and Africa

507

96%

2,814

96%

Latin America

143

100%

937

100%

North America

1,056

99%

6,037

99%

 
Notes:

  • Colleagues that do not answer or declare gender during self identification are also eligible for parental leave. The eligibility information provided reflects those colleagues who have self identified as male or female.
COLLEAGUE TRAINING
GRI 404-1
404-1
Average hours of training per year per employee

 

FY 2018

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

Training Hours per Colleague1

Skillport (Greif Learning Management System)

2.6

5.5

5

5.38

5.35

Leadership, Professional, Production

6

3.2

2

8.6 5.6
Colleagues eligible for compliance training in Skillport
- - - - 3,344
Managers eligible for compliance training in Skillport
- - - - 1,314

Average Training Hours by Gender2

Male
- - - - 3,344
Female
- - - - 1,314

Colleagues Completing Regular Performance Reviews3

85%

92%

89.1%

87%

80.2%

Colleagues Completing Regular Performance Reviews by gender, In Progress2

Male
- - - - 595
Female
- - - - 180

Colleagues Completing Regular Performance Reviews by gender, Cancelled

Male
- - - - 50
Female
- - - - 38

Colleagues Completing Regular Performance Reviews by gender, Successfully Completed

Male
- - - - 1,518
Female
- - - - 890
  1. Average hours of training per unique participant. Data excludes local functional training. For more information on safety training, please see Health & Safety.
  2. Includes eligible professional, clerical and administrative colleagues.

Employee HEALTH & SAFETY

GRI 403-9
403-9
Work-related injuries

 

FY 2013

FY 2014

FY 2015

FY 2016

FY 2017

FY 2018

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

MCR1

1.49

1.45

1.2

0.96

0.95

0.98

1.49

1.18

1.49

1.5

LWCR2

0.97

0.97

0.78

0.57

0.55

0.57

0.69

0.62

0.74

0.74
  1. MCR, or Medical Case Rate, measures the number of recordable injuries per 100 full-time employees in a 12-month period.
  2. LWCR, or Lost Workday Case Rate, measures the number of recordable injuries resulting in lost workdays per 100 full-time employees in a 12-month period.

 
Notes:

  • 2019 data includes Caraustar for only March forward – no data included for first 4 months of fiscal year.

SOCIAL OPERATIONAL POLICIES

Health and Safety Policy

Environmental Health and Safety Policy

Equal Opportunity Policy

Equal Employment Opportunity & Diversity Policy

Human Rights Policy

Human Rights Policy

Training Policy

Talent Management Policy

Business Ethics Policy

Code of Conduct

Fair Remuneration Policy

Equal Employment Opportunity & Diversity Policy

Fair Treatment of Others Policy

Employee Protection/Whistle Blower Policy

Code of Conduct

Anti-Bribery Ethics Policy

Anti-Bribery Compliance Policy

Policy Against Child Labor

Child Labor Policy

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT Policies

Social Supply Chain Management

Supplier Code of ConductConflict Minerals PolicyConflict Minerals Report

Supplier Guidelines Encompass ESG Areas; Publicly Disclosed

Supplier Code of Conduct

Product Data

PRODUCT QUALITY

 

 

FY 2017

FY 2018

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

Corrective Action Rate (CAR)1

 
Global Industrial Packaging North Amerca

1.3

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.6

0.7
Europe, Middle East and Africa

-

-

1.4

1.0

0.5

0.4
Latin America - - - - 0.1 0.2
Asia Pacific

-

-

2.7

1.3

0.8

0.7

Order Reliability Rate2

Global Industrial Packaging North Amerca

99.8%

99.8%

99.8%

99.8%

99.9%

 

Number of Customer Complaints

  
Global Industrial Packaging  North Amerca

389

350

330

277

189

181
Paper Packaging & Services (PPS)
-
-
-
-
-
170
Europe, Middle East and Africa
-
-
959
685
400
278
Latin America
-
-
-
-
89
71
Asia Pacific
-
-
298
137
90
73
  1. CAR measures customer complaints per 100,000 units produced.
  2. Order Reliability Rate defines the rate of failure between orders produced and estimates non-compliance with voluntary codes. No regulatory failures or resultant fines have been identified. As of FY22, Order Reliability Rate is no longer tracked.

ACTIVITY METRICS (SASB RT-CP-000.A, RT-CP-000.B, RT-CP-000.C)

Production by Substrate (Metric Tons)

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

Total

3,551,235

2,961,693

3,195,588

2,828,087

Paper

2,319,195

1,777,678

2,084,952

1,735,511

Plastic

264,450

216,954

176,444

182,435

Steel

967,633

967,017

934,154

910,096

Aluminum

7.3

44

38

45

Notes:

  • Production figures are aggregated based on primary substrate of finished good products.

Production by Revenue (%)

FY 2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

Paper

38.8%

42.5%

39.9%

42.48%

Plastic

17.9%

17.3%

17.8%

15.52%

Steel

32.0%

29.2%

31.9%

33.39%

Other1

11.3%

11.0%

10.5%

8.61%
  1. Other includes Filling, Reconditioning, Land and Other Misc. Products. Greif does not produce glass.

 
Notes:

  • Production figures are aggregated based on primary substrate of finished good products.